Conflux DAO# 12 Conflux Ecosystem Fund Usage / 本次投票为第四次关于生态基金用途投票

The Ecosystem Fund from the Genesis Block of Conflux Mainnet Tethys Network (launched in October 2020) is approximately 2 billion CFX, which unlocks 41.67 million CFX per month. This fund is currently being used for storage and gas fee sponsorships to support the ecosystem.
This vote is to determine whether the Ecosystem Fund will be used for other purposes for the period 18-24 months post-mainnet launch (Nov-April).
After Tethys Network has been live for 24 months, a new round of voting will be launched to discuss the Ecosystem Fund’s subsequent flows and usages.

Voting Options:

A: No other usages. Aside from storage and gas fee sponsorships, the rest will be destroyed to zero address each month

B: No other usages for now. Aside from storage and gas fee sponsorships, the rest will be locked in the staking contract until block number 134,854,258(estimated expiration date: October 29th, 2022)

C: Besides storage and gas fee sponsorships, it will setup fund to support Conflux eSpace Liquidity Incentive Program to help bootstrap and drive sustainable ecosystem development on Conflux eSpace,Conflux eSpace Liquidity Incentive Program:Conflux eSpace Liquidity Incentive Program [Open For Discussion]

CFX Vote Link:

https://governance.confluxnetwork.org/en/governance

FC Vote Link:

https://stampers.app/#/FansCoin/proposal/QmWQyK4tQYv5EEoAzVbgUjNVEcH7V2vdTGHhSr48KVpprt

Conflux DAO Ecosystem Governance Model:

https://forum.conflux.fun/t/conflux-dao-conflux-dao-ecosystem-governance/4247


Conflux 网络 Tethys 创世块生态基金部分(20亿CFX),每月解锁 4167万 CFX。现用于存储抵押及燃气费代付补贴,支持Conflux链上的合约生态。Conflux Tethys网络上线18个月至24个月之间,生态基金是否还做其他用途,将由本次投票结果决定。Tethys网络上线24个月之后,将会发起新一轮的投票,重新讨论后续生态基金的流向和使用途径。

选项/Option:

A.不做其他用途。每月除存储和燃气费代付补贴之外,剩下的部分,将销毁至0地址

B.暂不做其他用途。每月除存储和燃气费代付补贴之外,剩下的部分,将锁定到Staking合约至区块数 134,854,258 (大约至2022年10月29日)

C.存储和燃气费代付补贴之外,用于Conflux eSpace 流动性激励,以推动 Conflux 生态的健康可持续发展,Conflux eSpace 流动性激励计划详情参见:Conflux eSpace 流动性激励计划

CFX 投票链接:

https://governance.confluxnetwork.org/zh/governance/

FC 投票链接:

https://stampers.app/#/FansCoin/proposal/QmWQyK4tQYv5EEoAzVbgUjNVEcH7V2vdTGHhSr48KVpprt

Conflux DAO 生态治理说明:

https://forum.conflux.fun/t/conflux-dao-conflux-dao-ecosystem-governance/4247

2 Likes

Are we have already final Liquidity Program Clear Version? As we all see for now only open discussion stage. Why it’s add to DAO voting now? Here no any final suggested version. That clear describe rules , tiers( as Geoff say) and etc. Also we have Grants Program for support developers and blockchain startups that wants to launch on Conflux. = become a part of Conflux Ecosystem. Conflux Ecosystem include Conflux eSpace as a part. So Grants Program include eSpace projects too.

2 Likes

激励的cfx的前提要解除唯一的销毁机制!真是令人愤怒的一件事。
纵观币圈,销毁计划是经济模型中不可缺少的一项机制。现在还没有达到全球共识的地步!!!如此天量的币二级市场如何接的住!!!
多少即将进场的用户因为五十亿天量,团队,私募持币等经济模型而望而止步。请团队大格局考虑一下现在社区共识的感受。现在社区什么情况难道你们都没私访过吗。还在伤口上再撒把盐。
当年私募延迟释放社区多少人后悔!!
在没有完善的销毁计划替代请慎重!!

5 Likes

如果选项三通过,不出三个月,投票的人会拍断大腿!

1 Like

It’s 20% of emission, more than 100 millions dollars on liquidity support shared as extra rewards. Sure idea great and must be. But amount of liquidity program fund very large. And not any clear explanation about program reward mechanism. Here 2 billion fund from ecosystem. Why we must touch it, if we have grants fund? And other funds. Where tokens unlocked and not burn yet. ? It’s simple at the end crush CFx market. We get continuous dump. Same as we see since Binance listing. More than one year CFX market dump only. Short tf green candles looks like PnD not like organic growth

2 Likes

Conflux DAO 区块减产与锁仓投票当时就是两个互锁的错误,倡议重新DAO回,销毁该销毁的

1 Like

生态,生态,还是生态。
没有生态的conflux,就像一场打在棉花上的拳击比赛,根本使不上劲。国内的监管这么严,树图的nft摆在阿里上,才几天就下架了?国内不行,海外进不去,除了在生态上继续苟一苟,没别的办法。那没什么之前也有生态投票,最终投给了生态补助,但结果还是不行?的确,结果如此,确实不好怎么说。要说国产生态差吧,其实看样子也都还行。只能说,还是国产的不被世界认可,或者说生态太少,太卷了。
可现在不一样了,有了evm的横空出世,就有了和世界最大生态群以太坊对接的通道,什么是吸星大法啊。想想bsc链,我就不信只靠一个交易所能给bnb撑起这么大的市值。所以这次我还是选择生态。
就算全部销毁,有用吗?私募该跑早跑了,没跑的就等着价格起来再割一割,没有新的力量进来,就算明天销毁一半,价格也是先高后低,然后所有人都开始抛售。以cfx.现在的处境,就连销毁都已经无法改变局势了。只能搏一搏了。

3 Likes

As i write before no matter 2 millions or 2 billions total emission, if native token not have enough utility and network not have enough popularity from developers and trend active cryptocommunities around the world the result would be only one. Dump and death.
First on what based decision of cryptocommunity member invest or hash support , it’s a clear information, clear situation about holders, vesting periods, tokenomic at all.
We need at first turn back open discussions with founders.
About bnb it’s also very strong centralised. But have clear deflation line with more than 100+ variants of BNBUse. Utility + Community Trust + Active at Social and in Real Founder and CEO. CZ was a 70% of success of Binance Ecosytem. But one of his main effective side: he listen and hear community voice.
正如我之前写的,无论发行 200 万还是 20 亿,如果原生代币没有足够的实用性,并且网络在全球开发者和活跃的加密社区中没有足够的知名度,结果将只有一个: 转储和死亡。
首先,加密社区成员投资或维持哈希率的决定是基于什么,这是明确的信息,持有人的明确情况,归属期,一般的代币经济学。
我们需要先回去与创始人进行公开讨论。
就 bnb 而言,它也是非常高度中心化的。 但是有一个明确的通货紧缩线,有超过 100 多个 BNBUse 选项。 有用性 + 社区可信度 + 活跃于社交媒体和现实生活中创始人兼首席执行官。 CZ 是 Binance 生态系统成功的 70%。 但一个是他主要有效的一面:他倾听并听到社区的声音。

1 Like

从整个生态角度考量,先量化宽松,刺激整个生态的建设是重中之重。销毁只是基于后期生态繁荣之后,抵御通胀的手段而已。

1 Like