I support Ukraine in this attack that Russia is doing. That’s support colors there. I’m from Europe.
Conflux Social TipBot and Ecosystem Index
Потому ты и русский и украинский отлично знаешь и в амбассадор чате у тебя украинский флаг прекрасно конечно. И в твиттере but I want say you again thanks. For your confirmation of your ambassador role and that you not up for now any faucet.
I dont understand russia or ukranian for that matter.
Your application open on 21 April you already was a ambassador around one months Nio.
Idk for what you try to share incorrect info here. But may be you see in same any clue or good point for …. Idk for what.
I talked about Faucets in Discord few months back, but thanks. You’ve been wrong almost about everything there already.
Nio you are open here thread , grants proporsal on 21 April. You aleady was ambassador. And you already owner of Webomatic PoS pool. Not need to continue your bio Nio here. Look on pic and check your thread Conflux Faucets – for Core and ESpace - open date 21 April 2022
About discord only you say any here. Not anyone else.
Thanks again for confirmation your ambassador role.
Sure you not know who are doing discord faucet that’s why you are open here your application in next day after launch discord faucet and that why you are was first who are try discord faucet lol. You are so funny. You manner of discussion open more doors to Conflux Foundation. They like same style.
You can discuss this in private messages or create a separate topic for this, this does not apply to this issue.
So you want to say that grant proporsal is a issue? And say that to your ambassador it’s he come here and start explain things that well known to all.
Deep thanks Chinese community for support our ideas. Together we are turn Conflux Ecosystem and Community to success and bright future
Why are you even climbing into this branch and dragging of your plebeians??
Замечательное и уникальное предложение.
The grant was rejected because it does not meet the criteria to be eligible for either a Technical or Growth grant. Please review the docs for details on the type of projects we are looking to support via grants CONFLUX ECOSYSTEM GRANTS 2022
You are blocking Mitrandir account. We are review your tutorial and not meet any criteria that not be eligible for grant, as on tech as on growth part. Can you be more exact in your explanation. What criteria not meet that proporsal ans what criteria meet Faucet proporsal? And explain community, why your committee members allow and apply that product on tests. Why all around vote for, but only grants committee try to cancel it? Coz for now that looks exact like Mitrandir say, that you are deep centralised, apply only affiliated with your committee projects. I also want to make a warn community about TraderXBot usage. And can you explain why their admin in telegram promote it before grant apply in Conflux and swappi telegram chats? It’s one more example for all how Conflux Foundation make a deals. You step by step lost trust of all around. May be you would be have fair for use personal accounts for public discussions. We are wants to know who are exactly speak with us. We wait your answers. Best of all for you.
Technical criteria:
Support cross space: eSpace, Core, Build in Wallet, support NFT, mint , claim, transfers.
Community Growth: Oriented on the most progressive crypto community messenger Telegram. Benefits: increase community activity, increase community growth, increase stats of Conflux blockchain and active addresses. And more more more.
What criterias not meet that application?
Reminder to our community to keep discussions in the grant forum focused on grants only. If the replies to this post continue to stray away for this channels purpose, it will be deleted.
So my questions all according to grants and exact to that application. You say about criteria, we check criterias and show that proposal meet much more high priority criterias that described in your tutorial: CONFLUX ECOSYSTEM GRANTS 2022 as Technical as Growth.
Great proposal and product. As one of the community member, who are already see how it’s works on tests wants to say thanks proposal team deep thanks for their work and continued support of Russian Conflux Community, continued develop and propose products and projects/ideas with exclusive oriented on success and organic growth of Conflux Ecosystem and build on top of Conflux Network. You guys doing great!!
And really very strange argue and decision went from @Grants_Committee. It’s looks like @Grants_Committee not oriented on Community and Ecosystem Growth. I’m also join to all questions that was direct to @Geoff , @thegaram, @Grants_Committee and hope that it’s was simple one time mistake, that they are solve via changing their politics and decision about that awesome proposal and relationships with grants application at all.
Hello. Can you plz be more precise in your reasons of decline? Coz it’s really very unclear and strange. Our proposal meet not one, but list of criterias Technical and Growth Grants.
Also feel free to check that last telegram update(Ann date today): https://t.me/confluxrussians/4768
It’s announcement about Ton Wallet integration in Telegram.
Conflux Ecosystem today already have product that would be “must have” tomorrow. For now you @Grants_Committee and @Geoff not simple vote against trends, progress, any logic. You vote against Ecosystem and Community.
Привет. Не могли бы вы быть более точны в причинах отказа? Так как он выглядит действительно очень непонятно и странно. Наше предложение соответствует не одному, а целому ряду критериев Technical and Growth Grants.
Кроме этого, нельзя не обратить внимание на это, последнее обновление команды от Telegram TON (опубликовано несколько часов назад): https://t.me/confluxrussians/4768
А именно аннонс о интеграции Ton Wallet в Telegram.
У экосистемы Conflux уже сегодня есть продукт, который завтра перейдет в статус “must have” для всех экосистем, сетей и сообществ криптовалютного мира. Но вместо того, чтобы поддержать и сохранить статус лидера и экосистемы с не просто конкурентноспособными, а эксклюзивными и инновационными готовыми продуктами, Вы, @Grants_Committee и @Geoff, не просто голосуете против трендов, прогресса и любой логики. Вы голосуете против Экосистемы и Сообщества Conflux. Как это можно объяснить?
As per the grants process, a tier-2 grant can only be approved if 3 or more committee members are actively in favor of it. Note that “meeting the criterias” is necessary but not sufficient.
This application failed to convince the committee and because of this, we will not move forward with it. As for my concerns, you can see it in my previous comment: The application is too complex and the price tag is too high.
Attacking the committee will only further reduce your chances of getting a grant approved. Let’s all get to work to build Conflux instead.
Thanks for reply Peter. But you for now say that proposal meet criterias. @Grants_Committee say before that proposal not meet criteria. We have here two committee members and two separate opinions. That are contrargue each other.
As I answer before on your first comment, we are ready to change funding tier.
About difficulty, massive tests shown that your opinion not right. Users operate with product without any problems.
About 3 votes. Here only two committee members share their opinion. And only you share exact argumented with questions and recommendations for. And tier2 not required closed committee discussions, it’s required 3 votes and community opinion too. Why you ignore that? And why you again share decision without any exact explanation. “Committee discuss” it’s not enought and not clear for.
And not needs to named logic questions from community side and community opinion as attack of committee. They are share their thoughts.
Hello. hello. Thank you for your explanations, but you did not explain anything. The reasons previously voiced were non-compliance with the criteria. you are now saying that it is not enough to meet the criteria (that is, the project meets the criteria goes like this). I and not only I ask you to give open detailed explanations of what is the reason for the committee’s refusal? You didn’t answer this question. Why did you start threatening me? Where in my message did you see an attack on your committee?
And about difficulty you are not right, I’m test it, it’s common in use. Not more difficult as any other telegram bots.
As I see in proposal here include in price already community activities prize pools, and marketing part for involving new members in Conflux community. And at all proposal at full oriented closed on Conflux Only Ecosystem and Community. That shown as well position of project team. They are build it for stimulate Conflux Success, not for stimulate own personal budgets.